However, scientific advances in the 20th century throw doubt on the Newtonian idea of representing reality through theory, as have philosophy, the social sciences, psychoanalysis, feminism and some traditional knowledge systems. New theory in physics states that the mind works with ideas and that the relationships it makes are not representative of reality, but of this ideas.  Therefore, the "truth" of an idea is not determined by its correspondence with an absolute truth, but rather its consistency with our own experience.

And here is Constanza's thesis:  The authors proposing this paradigm (who are mostly men) note the importance of communicational, emotional and in certain forms, political expressions in human processes, but do not analyze in depth or detail some of the dimensions linked to political construction and human motivation because they have associated them with the feminine or with femininity.

And part of the problem is that in this "detail," gender expressions are blurred, entailing the risk of reflecting an a-historic homogenization of humanity that excludes, obscures and makes invisible contributions from the feminine and women, among others.

Constanza has developed her suspicions about how women's perspectives have been obscured, based on scientific and intellectual practices that confront or neutralize "the feminine." This world of science and intellectuality, has been institutionally decreed as the place where knowledge, and therefore paradigms, are built.